RESEARCH ARTICLE INTELLIGENCE

Articles Published 17 July 2026

Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, Imaging, and Management

AUTHORS & AFFILIATIONS

Dr. Nabin Kumar Yadav Department of Radiology, Docversity University School of Medicine, India Corresponding author
Dr. Junaid Khan Department of Radiology, Docversity University School of Medicine, India
Yunusov Umrbek Odilovich Department of Radiology, Himchan Hospital, Uzbekistan

READER ENGAGEMENT

Article metrics

Source-labelled data
121Article / abstract viewsOJS COUNTER usage records
68PDF downloadsOJS COUNTER usage records
18Views · last 30 daysOJS COUNTER usage records
17PDF downloads · last 30 daysOJS COUNTER usage records
Readership over time

Recorded months within the last 12 months. Each bar shows recorded access events; the current month is partial.

● Article / abstract views● PDF downloads
Jul 2026
25 views
15 PDF downloads
Aug 2026
44 views
22 PDF downloads
Sep 2026
37 views
15 PDF downloads
Oct 2026
15 views
16 PDF downloads

Usage totals reflect processed OJS records and may lag recent visits. Citation sources count independently and are not combined.

Keywords:

Radiation Necrosis, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Tumors

Abstract

Incidence: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a common late complication of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with reported rates ranging 2–30+% depending on tumor type, dose, and follow-up. For brain metastases, landmark studies report RN in ~8–11% at 1–2 years (RTOG-9005), ~24–26% in early series, and ~5% in modern trials. For benign tumors, meningioma cohorts show RN rates ~3–27% and vestibular schwannoma ~0.5–12%. Fractionated SRS markedly lowers RN incidence for larger lesions. Risk Factors: Key predictors include treatment-related factors (high dose per fraction, large treated volume [especially normal brain V10–V12], re-irradiation) and patient/tumor factors (tumor size, histology, location, concurrent therapies). E.g. normal brain V12 of 5/10/15 cc yields ~10/15/20% RN risk. Concurrent systemic therapy or adjuvant resection also elevate risk (adjusted ORs ~8.2 and 3.7). Prior SRS increases RN risk (∼20% 1-year RN if same lesion was re-treated). Imaging: Distinguishing RN from tumor recurrence is challenging. Conventional MRI often shows ring-enhancement with edema, but this is nonspecific. Advanced MRI (DWI, perfusion, spectroscopy) and metabolic imaging improve accuracy. DWI/ADC tends to be higher in RN. MRI “T1/T2 mismatch” (ill-defined T1 enhancement vs surrounding T2 signal) has ~83% sensitivity/91% specificity. Perfusion MRI is useful: e.g. relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) cutoff ~1.5–2.1 distinguishes tumor vs RN (sensitivity ~91– 100%, specificity ~72–95%). MR spectroscopy (low Cho/Cr ratio suggests RN). Amino-acid PET tracers (e.g. ^18F-FET, ^18F-FDOPA) outperform FDG; for instance, F-DOPA PET can reach ~90% sensitivity/specificity at optimized uptake thresholds. No single modality is definitive; a multimodal approach (MRI + perfusion + PET) yields best diagnostic accuracy. Management: First-line therapy for symptomatic RN is corticosteroids (rapid edema control). However, prolonged steroids have toxicity. Bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) is highly effective: a meta-analysis reported symptomatic improvement in ~88% of patients, radiographic improvement in ~86%, and steroid reduction in ~45%. Typical regimens are 5–10 mg/kg IV every 2–3 weeks for 4–6 cycles, which often yields dramatic edema resolution, though recurrence after discontinuation can occur. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive option for RN (often concurrently obtaining biopsy); it yields symptomatic control in ~71% (vs ~88% with bevacizumab) and radiographic improvement ~65% (vs 86%), with similar safety profiles. Surgical resection is reserved for large, refractory RN causing mass effect, and yields rapid relief of symptoms and allows tissue diagnosis (histology often shows mix of gliosis, necrosis, or occult tumor). Hyperbaric oxygen has anecdotal support (angiogenesis/edema reduction) but lacks high-level evidence. Follow-up: Close MRI surveillance (NCCN: every 2–3 months for 1–2 years then 4–6 months) is recommended to identify RN and recurrences early.

FULL TEXT

Read the article

DOWNLOAD PAPER

Published

17-07-2026

How to Cite

Yadav, D. N. K., Khan, D. J., & Odilovich, Y. U. (2026). Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, Imaging, and Management. Journal of Scientific Research and Technology, 4(7), 88–97. Retrieved from https://www.jsrtjournal.com/index.php/JSRT/article/view/521

Issue

Section

Articles
SCHOLARLY DISCOVERY

Follow the research record

Check article metadata and journal source records in their original services.

Clarivate Web of ScienceWeb of ScienceESCI till 2024 · historical verification PDF ↗ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarJournal profile ↗ CrossrefCrossrefDOI records ↗ ResearchGateResearchGateJournal page ↗ ISSN International CentreISSN 2583-8660Official serial record ↗ SciSpaceSciSpaceJournal record ↗ OpenAlexOpenAlexScholarly source record ↗ ScilitScilitJournal source record ↗ Semantic ScholarSemantic ScholarTitle search ↗ Academia.eduAcademia.eduJSRT profile ↗ ROADROADISSN directory record ↗ SJIFactorSJIFactorJournal listing ↗ Cresta MetricsCresta MetricsJournal profile ↗ ZenodoZenodoISSN search ↗ OpenAIREOpenAIRE-connected recordZenodo source record ↗ International Impact Factor ServicesIIFSService reference ↗