RESEARCH ARTICLE INTELLIGENCE

Articles Published 17 June 2025

Analysis And Comparison Of Volumetric Calculations For Open-Cast Mines Using Two Different Surveying Techniques: Drone-Based Photogrammetry And Traditional Total Station Method

AUTHORS & AFFILIATIONS

Surendra S Gaden Research Scholar, Department of Mining Engineering, College of Technology and Engineering, MPUAT, Udaipur(313002),Rajasthan, India.
Dr. Anupam Bhatnagar Head of Department, Department of Mining Engineering , College of Technology and Engineering, MPUAT, Udaipur(313002),Rajasthan, India.
Dr Hitanshu Kaushal Advisor, H K & Associates, Udaipur(313001), Rajasthan, India.

READER ENGAGEMENT

Article metrics

Source-labelled data
739Article / abstract viewsOJS COUNTER usage records
462PDF downloadsOJS COUNTER usage records
50Views · last 30 daysOJS COUNTER usage records
33PDF downloads · last 30 daysOJS COUNTER usage records
Readership over time

Recorded months within the last 12 months. Each bar shows recorded access events; the current month is partial.

● Article / abstract views● PDF downloads
Nov 2025
22 views
16 PDF downloads
Dec 2025
18 views
15 PDF downloads
Jan 2026
20 views
21 PDF downloads
Feb 2026
37 views
34 PDF downloads
Mar 2026
52 views
42 PDF downloads
Apr 2026
107 views
56 PDF downloads
May 2026
76 views
45 PDF downloads
Jun 2026
49 views
14 PDF downloads
Jul 2026
52 views
50 PDF downloads
Aug 2026
157 views
65 PDF downloads
Sep 2026
56 views
28 PDF downloads
Oct 2026
28 views
26 PDF downloads

Usage totals reflect processed OJS records and may lag recent visits. Citation sources count independently and are not combined.

Keywords:

Open-Cast Mine, Volumetric Calculation, Drone Survey, Photogrammetry, Total Station, Surveying Techniques, 3D Modeling, Mining Survey, Volume Estimation, Geospatial Data, Accuracy Comparison, Mine Planning, Remote Sensing, Stockpile Measurement, Survey Efficiency.

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of volumetric calculations in open-cast mining using two distinct surveying techniques: drone-based photogrammetry and conventional total station methods. The primary aim is to evaluate the accuracy, efficiency, and practicality of both approaches in estimating stockpile volumes, excavation quantities, and overall site topography within open-pit mining operations. Drone surveys, leveraging advanced photogrammetric techniques, enable rapid data acquisition and the generation of nhigh-resolution 3D models, offering considerable time savings and reducing the potential for human error. Conversely, total station surveys—renowned for their precision and reliability—deliver accurate ground-based point measurements. While more labor-intensive, they remain a preferred method in the mining industry, particularly forn smaller areas where high precision is paramount. This study outlines the advantages and limitations of both techniques, focusing on parameters such as survey duration, cost-effectiveness, data processing requirements, and the accuracy of volume estimations. The findings indicate that drone surveys provide a faster and more efficient alternative, whereas total station surveys excel in confined or detail intensive environments. Ultimately, the study underscores the potential for integrating both methods to optimize volumetric assessments in open-cast mines, combining the strengths of each for more robust and adaptive mine planning.

FULL TEXT

Read the article

DOWNLOAD PAPER

Published

17-06-2025

How to Cite

Surendra S Gaden, Dr. Anupam Bhatnagar, & Dr Hitanshu Kaushal. (2025). Analysis And Comparison Of Volumetric Calculations For Open-Cast Mines Using Two Different Surveying Techniques: Drone-Based Photogrammetry And Traditional Total Station Method . Journal of Scientific Research and Technology, 3(6), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.61808/jsrt229

Issue

Section

Articles
SCHOLARLY DISCOVERY

Follow the research record

Check article metadata and journal source records in their original services.

Clarivate Web of ScienceWeb of ScienceESCI till 2024 · historical verification PDF ↗ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarJournal profile ↗ CrossrefCrossrefDOI records ↗ ResearchGateResearchGateJournal page ↗ ISSN International CentreISSN 2583-8660Official serial record ↗ SciSpaceSciSpaceJournal record ↗ OpenAlexOpenAlexScholarly source record ↗ ScilitScilitJournal source record ↗ Semantic ScholarSemantic ScholarTitle search ↗ Academia.eduAcademia.eduJSRT profile ↗ ROADROADISSN directory record ↗ SJIFactorSJIFactorJournal listing ↗ Cresta MetricsCresta MetricsJournal profile ↗ ZenodoZenodoISSN search ↗ OpenAIREOpenAIRE-connected recordZenodo source record ↗ International Impact Factor ServicesIIFSService reference ↗